Wednesday, July 28, 2010

do this in remembrance of .... what?

1 Corinthians 11 
23For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, 24and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me." 25In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me." 26For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.
we were to eat and drink the  Lord's Supper in remembrance of Jesus Christ.  ...all across the country, people are slowing down the service, perhaps dimming the lights, and playing some music while people stay in their seats and ... what?  what are they doing?  remembering what?  it is my experience that we are generally told to remember our sins.

but why then are people doing it in remembrance of their sins?  i suspect that it is because of a collective misunderstanding of the next couple verses...
 27Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. 29For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. 
while it certainly SEEMS to indicate we should examine our sins, this is not the context.  the context is that certain people were showing up with food - some ate all the food before others even arrived, some had plenty and ate all their food without offering it others who had nothing, some drank so much wine that they got drunk, etc.  some people would show up 'late' and other would show up so poor they had nothing, hoping to eat, and yet they left hungry.  how's that for fellowship and loving each other ?!
so, when these men were urged to 'examine himself', they were being urged to think about how much they were eating and drinking.  have they had enough to eat?  enough to drink?  do they have plenty and can give to others?  must they eat now?  or can they not wait to enjoy a meal with Christian brethren?

20When you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you eat, 21for as you eat, each of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry, another gets drunk. 22Don't you have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you for this? Certainly not!
...
29For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. 31But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment. 32When we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world.
 33So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for each other. 34If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you meet together it may not result in judgment. 
      And when I come I will give further directions
indeed, it would be better to eat alone in their homes than to come to the gathering and eat everything up in front of people who had nothing.  ...if they would 'recognize the body of the lord' (that is, other Christians), then they would either share or, at a minimum, eat and drink alone at home.

[aside: i think all this may actually be related to the verse on the 'weak, sick and asleep'.  i suspect that some people could eat nothing and got weak. some others ate so much that they got sick, and still others drank so much wine that they fell asleep.  these are the consequences; and, though seemingly natural, they are described as 'the Lord's judgment'.  this is emphatically not punishment; Jesus Christ received all of the punishment in our stead.]

Takeaway
the Lord's supper is about remembering Jesus Christ, not about remembering your sins.
Application
it is suitable to remember Jesus Christ and rejoice in Him and in what He did at the Lord's supper; being dour and serious about your sins is not suitable at the Lord's supper.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

making Jesus Lord...

the idea that we 'make Jesus Lord of our life' is curious.  first of all, Jesus is Lord whether you like it or not, whether you know it or not.  but, second, Jesus Himself is Life...He is your Life.

...what really happens is something different.  over time, we just realize, more and more solidly, that He is who He says He is and you have no life other than Him.

Takeaway
Jesus is Life and Lord already
Application
it is suitable to ask Jesus to show us who He is already, rather than trying to 'make Him something'

Saturday, July 24, 2010

for God's glory...

most Christians believe that they can and should do things 'for the glory of God'. giving God more glory, then, becomes the motivation for all types of service.  [1 Cor 10:31 seems to say this.]

i would put a couple different ideas in your head.

first, what is more glorifying to God:

  1. the small things we can do for God? or the big things God has done?
  2. the small love we express for God?  the gigantic love God expresses for us?
  3. the things we do for God?  taking away our sins on the cross?
in every case, i will argue that God Himself gives Himself more glory; you are not as important for giving God glory as you think.

i would propose to you that the most God-glorifying thing that exists is God's love, not your love.  God's love within the Trinity, God's love for us, God's love placed inside of us to love Him and others is, simply, the most glorifying thing that exists.  now, of all of God's great love, the single greatest expression of that love is the gospel; seeing the gospel in truth, believing the gospel in faith, repeating the gospel over and over is, in my opinion, the best way for God's love and God's glory to be expressed.

relax a little bit.  people get really strung-out about doing things for 'the glory of God'; i would propose to you that the main thing about the 'the glory of God' as 'gospel', is to simply believe the gospel and continuously revel in it.




second, what is this thing we call 'the glory of God'???  what is it, really???  is it some glow that surrounds God at all times?  what is it?

i propose that when the bible refers to 'the glory of God', it is referring to the gospel;  'the glory of God' is the gospel.  1 Cor 10:31 is a prime example of this; Paul is exhorting strong Christians to avoid a 'bad witness' before unbelievers.  (unbelievers do not understand freedom in Christ; they generally hold Christians to a high standard and judge the Christians, Christianity and the 'Christian' God by that standard.)  when Paul uses the 'glory of God' phrase, what Paul means is the gospel; Paul could have written, 'do all for the GOSPEL', just as easily.
i know this is hard to believe at first; i encourage you to go through the entire books of 1 Cor, 2 Cor and the other Pauline epistles to see (1) how often 'gospel' and 'glory' are directly connected and (2) see if you can't substitute 'gospel' when you see 'glory'.  when you see this connection, you will relax a little bit.

alternatively, i will propose that the 'glory of God' are His People.  this verse has always stuck with me for this very reason:
Proverbs 14:28  In a multitude of people is a king's glory, But in the dearth of people is a prince's ruin.


Takeaway
the gospel bringing many children to God is the glory of God.  believing the gospel and continuously reveling in it is more important than all the things you think you should do.
Application
it is suitable to simply believe the gospel and continuously revel in it.

Friday, July 23, 2010

punished by God?

some Christians think that God punishes them for sins.

really?  are you kidding me?

the Word says that there is one punishment for sin - death.   ...if you get physically sick, lose a job, etc, etc, etc, you are expressly NOT being punished for sin.  ...death is the one and only punishment for sin that there is; you are kidding yourself if you think you can be punished by anything less of death.  [or did you really think that sin can be punished with a light slap on the wrist?]

in my opinion, people who believe they are punished by God have yet to internalize:
  1. how truly abhorrent God finds sin
  2. why death is the only punishment for sin
  3. that Christ was punished for all our sins, INSTEAD of us
  4. that the punishment for our sins is totally complete
  5. that the work of Jesus Christ is totally complete
  6. that no sins remain to be punished
  7. that God has completely forgiven us by His complete, amazing grace

Takeaway
we are never punished by God; Jesus Christ was punished instead.
Application
it is suitable to believe we are never punished, that God is wholly happy with us.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

cheap grace?

'cheap grace' was coined by the pastor/author Dietrich Bonhoeffer; you can read about it on the web.  unlike many pastors of his day, Bonhoeffer apposed Hitler and was locked up; he is highly respected for doing so.  to give him as much grace as i can, i imagine that he saw Christians turning their backs on the peoples Hitler hated, peoples that God loved; i imagine that many Christians turned their backs because they were afraid of the worldly consequences (getting locked up or killed).  
if i was in nazi germany and as bold as Bonhoeffer, i imagine that i too would want those Christians to change their behavior...i imagine that my desire might get the better of me and, apart from my best judgement, i too might criticize them with this 'cheap grace' idea....instead of encouraging them with the 'full gospel'.


the rest of this post is not about Bonhoeffer or Christians in nazi germany; it's about the Christians i know in the uber-comfortable USA.






- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


the phrase, 'cheap grace', does not appear in the bible.  grace is abundant, grace is spreading, grace is abounding, grace is surpassing, grace is sufficient, grace is manifold, but grace is not described as 'cheap'.  (Romans 5:17, Romans 5:20, 2 Corinthians 4:15, 2 Corinthians 9:8, 2 Corinthians 9:14, 2 Corinthians 12:9, 1 Timothy 1:14, Peter 4:10)   
...why, then are we talking about 'cheap grace' instead of 'abounding grace'?  why are we focused on something bad instead of something good?



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



it scares me that people use the term 'cheap grace' to express their distaste with the actions of others. 


'grace' cost a lot of God, so no one can argue that grace is cheap.


unfortunately, the words 'cheap grace' leaves people with a fear that grace can run out, that grace is scarce, that grace is in limited supply.  expensive things are scarce things; scarce things are expensive things; if grace is expensive, it must be scarce; if grace is scarce, i had better be awfully careful with the way i act.  the term, 'cheap grace', leaves people here...without enough grace.  and that is scary.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


here are three things that i think the 'cheap grace' crowd could emphasize instead:
  1. indeed, grace DID cost God much, but the price has been fully paid already; grace costs Him nothing more than what He has already paid; as Jesus said - 'it is finished'.
  2. grace is infinitely abundant.  God has grace enough to forgive us of all things, of anything.  we cannot out-sin the grace of God.  ...when we sin, grace simply increases all the more [check Romans 5:20 and Romans 6:1].  believing in the grace of God means that we revel in it, that we soak in it, that we breath it and drink it and eat it; God's grace is abundant.
  3. grace IS expensive, but it gives God what He wants - and what He wants is us, His children.  grace IS expensive, but He bought us...and He was happy to buy us.  the price (grace) was less than what we are worth to Him.
  4. it is probably more accurate to say that 'grace WAS expensive and IS valuable' than 'grace IS expensive'.  i suppose it might be how a married couple feels about their engagement ring...the ring WAS expensive and IS valuable.  it is like a family heirloom passed down through the generations...it WAS expensive and IS valuable.  though this gift WAS expensive for the Father, it IS now valuable and free for His children.
this all makes the grace of God so completely different from anything we humans naturally understand from our experience in life; we can only understand grace supernaturally.  grace is expensive, but is abundant; grace is expensive, but more grace costs nothing more; grace is expensive, but God's children are worth even more; grace WAS expensive, but IS valuable.   ...now that's amazing grace!


i believe that people worried about 'cheap grace' are focused on sin instead of God.  furthermore, i firmly believe that focusing on sin will get you nowhere, and it certainly will not result in less sin.   ...sin reduction is a side-benefit that results as believers keep looking to God and His grace, as believers believe all the more in God's finished work, God's grace poured out on us.  
you cannot reduce sin, which is the reliance on your self-life, by exerting your self-life....your self-life remains just as strong as before.  while you might stop certain obvious self-life-sins via your self-life-effort, hidden self-life-sins will just step in and replace them; you will stop drinking and carousing and lying only to find yourself more proud, more judgmental and more legalistic.  while you were attempting to escape your old bondage, you will find yourself in just as much bondage as before; it is the rare person who will see this new bondage in themselves...most will think they are 'doing good'.  ...as if (obvious) drinking and lying are 'worse sins' than (hidden) pride and legalism.  so sad.
the key to sinning less is not will-power and disciplines, but simply believing God.  you get reborn when you believe God and give up on your self-life; you also grow when you believe God and give up on your self-life; this is the kind of growth you really want.




Takeaway
grace is expensive, but the expense is less than what God received.  grace is abundant, and ever increases at no further cost to God; we are forgiven - it is finished; we are worth more to God than what grace cost Him.  grace WAS expensive and IS valuable.
believing God is the key to growth.  you didn't get saved via self-effort; you don't grow via self-effort either.
Application
it is suitable to not talk about 'cheap grace' or even 'expensive grace' anymore...it is suitable to talk of 'valuable and abundant grace, which ever increases at no further cost, and cost less than what we are worth...a great mystery of the faith'.
it is suitable to give up on changing our behavior through our self-life/ self-effort and to simply believe God.

Monday, July 12, 2010

you talkin' to me?

often, Christians think Jesus is hard to understand.  i sure did.  these days, He is much more clear to me.

the toughest thing about Jesus is that He often says things that directly contradict the 'gospel of grace' that we read in acts and the epistles.  read for yourself:

  • Matthew 6:12 
  • Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.
  • Matthew 6:14-15 
  • For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.  But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.
  • Matthew 18:21-35 
  • Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?"  22Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.   23"Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. 24As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand talents was brought to him. 25Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.   26"The servant fell on his knees before him. 'Be patient with me,' he begged, 'and I will pay back everything.' 27The servant's master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.   28"But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii. He grabbed him and began to choke him. 'Pay back what you owe me!' he demanded.   29"His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, 'Be patient with me, and I will pay you back.'   30"But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. 31When the other servants saw what had happened, they were greatly distressed and went and told their master everything that had happened.   32"Then the master called the servant in. 'You wicked servant,' he said, 'I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to.  33Shouldn't you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you?' 34In anger his master turned him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed.   35"This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from your heart."
  • Luke 6:37
  • "Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.
  • Luke 11:4
  • Forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not into temptation. ' "
  • Luke 17:3-4
  • So watch yourselves. "If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.  If he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times comes back to you and says, 'I repent,' forgive him."


the above are but one example - Jesus is directly saying that people MUST forgive other people perfectly in order to be forgiven themselves.  we can try to wiggle out of what He is saying, we can try to explain away His 'hard teachings', but He means exactly what is right there on the surface...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

and yet, i totally believe in the gospel of grace; i totally believe that we do NOT have to forgive other people perfectly in order to be forgiven.  thus, i believe we are saved in direct contradiction to the words of Jesus.

why is that?

it's because Jesus is not speaking to me.  in fact, Jesus is speaking 2000 years ago to a people convinced they would make it to heaven if they obeyed the letter of the Law.  Jesus is 'raising the bar', introducing to the 'spirit of the Law' - the perfection of God Himself.  Jesus is showing them that no-one lives up to God's righteous standard, not even those who seem to obey the letter of the Law.

it's all meant to lead them to a knowledge of personal sin and their need of Him as Savior.

as such, it does not apply to any Christian.  today, God encourages us to forgive others, but He does not require it.  our salvation is a free gift, no strings attached.

Takeaway
in the Gospels, Jesus is not always talking to you; often, Jesus is actually talking to the people He was talking to.
Application
be very careful when you want to apply the words of Jesus to yourself or other Christians.  ask yourself if Jesus might be trying to convince the people He was talking to, self-righteous people, of their sin and their need for a Savior.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

head knowledge vs heart knowledge...

Christians tend to believe that they often have 'head knowledge' that has not yet become 'heart knowledge'. i believe that this is the opposite of what is really going on.

King David cried out to God in Ps 51, 'create in me a clean heart'. God has done so in every single believer; our hearts are completely new and renewed. there is no more heart transformation necessary; there is no more heart transformation possible.

rather, believers experience 'head transformation'. we're told that we 'have the mind of Christ'. yet we're also encouraged (1) to 'renew our mind' and (2) to not be 'double-minded'.  it is not the case that we take our (learned) head knowledge and move it down to our hearts; rather, we take our (Christ-given) unconscious heart knowledge and move it up to conscious head knowledge.

by the way...what's THE most important thing to have your mind transformed about, to no longer be double-minded about? it's the true, full gospel.

Takeaway
believer...God gave you a new heart and the mind of Christ.
Application
it is suitable to be ever more certain of the true, full Gospel.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Law conscious or Grace conscious? sin conscious or God conscious?

Law makes a person conscious of sin; believers are not under Law.
The Holy Spirit convicts the world with regard to sin; believers are not of the world.


Mercy and Grace make a person conscious of God and His perfect forgiveness in Christ.


Law conscious --> sin conscious
Grace conscious --> God conscious


Being Law and Sin conscious does not help a believer stop sinning or start doing good works; being Grace and God conscious is the only thing that can do either.


Takeaway
there is a world of difference between being Law/Sin conscious and being Grace/God conscious.
Application
it is suitable to be Grace/God conscious.
Question
do you find yourself more conscious of your sins/the sins of others or more conscious of God within you/others?

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

do you feel really free?

 we read:
Galatians 5:1 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
do you feel free?  really really free?
if you do not, you might have let yourself be burdened by a yoke of slavery.  ...just the fact that we read this here indicates that it must happen to some people, some of the time.

Takeaway
some people in the church will be burdened by a yoke of slavery.
Application
it is suitable to examine ourselves and others to see if we are burdened by a yoke of slavery.

Monday, July 5, 2010

on forsaking your first love...

what does it mean to forsake your first love?
like the 'lukewarm Christian' question, this comes up in Revelations 2-3.
'forsaking your first love' means to forsake the -true Gospel-.  people usually assume that the 'first love' is Jesus Christ...but i have never seen that in anyone.  every believer i know first falls for the Gospel, and later, over many years, maybe falls for Jesus Christ.  no, i truly believe that the Gospel is our 'first love'.
the Ephesians had accepted the Gospel with joy and had lived with freedom.  they had deeds, they endured hardship, they removed false teachers, lots of great stuff.  ...but they had forsaken their first love.
i see this ALL THE TIME with new believers.  they start out with just the Gospel; they enjoy a period of sublime peace and really enjoy their relationship with God.  but after a little while, they start wondering 'what they should do' and 'what God wants from them'.  the result is that they look to add something to the Gospel - this is, almost inevitably, the Law.

Takeaway
forsaking your first love is forsaking the true Gospel, generally by adding the Law to it.
Application
it is suitable to hang onto the true Gospel.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

on lukewarm Christians...

what is a lukewarm Christian as mentioned in Rev 3?
people usually think that lukewarm Christians are not 'on fire for the Lord'...that they are self-satisfied and overly-content and aren't busy doing things that matter to God.

i disagree.
lukewarm Christians are neither hot nor cold for the -true Gospel-.  it is not that they do not evangelize enough, it is that their Gospel has been infected.  ...not infected by wealth, but infected by the Law.  they mistakenly think that they are 'rich and have everything they want' because they have added the Law to the true Gospel.  you see, people who only have the Gospel tend to, as a figure of spiritual speech, think they are poor; they then look for something that will make them 'rich' and find the Law; they then grab onto the Law...and believe they have 'everything they need'.

Takeaway
lukewarm Christians add the Law to the true Gospel.
Application
it is suitable to believe the true Gospel, not the Law-infected one you will commonly hear